Advances in Environmental Studies

ISSN: 2642-4231

 Editor-in-chief

  Dr. James Harold Clarke
  Vanderbilt University,   USA

Review Article | Volume 7 | Issue 1 | DOI: 10.36959/742/255 Open Access

An Assessment of Watershed Management Practices in Gullele Botanical Garden, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Gudeta Chalchisa and Birhanu Kebede, PhD

  • Gudeta Chalchisa 1*
  • Birhanu Kebede 1
  • Botanist at Gullele Botanical Garden, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
  • Ambo University, Centre for Environmental Science, Ethiopia

Chalchisa G, Kebede B (2023) An Assessment of Watershed Management Practices in Gullele Botanical Garden, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Adv Environ Stud 7(1):552-556

Accepted: June 28, 2023 | Published Online: June 30, 2023

An Assessment of Watershed Management Practices in Gullele Botanical Garden, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Abstract


The study will be explore the prospects and approaches of watershed management practices of past and presents at Gullele Botanical Garden, Addis Ababa city administration, by assessing and evaluating the existing complex set of biophysical condition, conservation practices and identifying the key watershed problems as well as the root causes.

The information of the study will be gathered from official documents, direct observation, interview the office technician and experts. Then, the gather data will be analyzed both qualitative and quantitative as well as checked, arranged, processed and analyzed in R software and word sheet. Others GIS data models will be analyzed by using Arc mag 10.3.

It will be indicate, the DAM A and around reserved forest site watersheds, watershed management focuses only on soil and water conservation. Emphasis will be place on choice of technology for soil and water conservation measures. By use a combination of purposive and random sampling techniques and will obtain data from Gullele Botanical Garden office data, Books, study reports, student theses as well as published and unpublished documents of other organizations.

Introduction


The watershed is the land and water area, which pitch in runoff to a common point. It’s considered a biological, economic, physical, and social system. Watershed management has emerged as a new paradigm for planning, development, and management of land, water, and biomass resources with a focus on social and environmental aspects with a participatory approach.

The economic and resource development of developing countries depends on the performance of the agricultural sector; the contribution of this sector depends on how the natural resources are managed and conserved. Unfortunately, in the majority of developing nations, the quality and quantity of natural resources are decreasing resulting in more severe droughts and floods [1].

In most developing countries, the major factor for land degradation is improper and unsustainable land use and management due to population pressure and small farm sizes, land tenure insecurity, and land redistribution, limited access to credit and education [2].

Ethiopia is one of the developing countries in which land resources are becoming increasing scarcity and the quality of resources such as soil, water, plants, and animals are decreasing as a result of improper use and management. Land degradation in the form of soil erosion, sedimentation, depletion of nutrients, deforestation, and overgrazing is one of the basic problems facing farmers in Ethiopia and this limits their ability to increase agricultural production and reduce poverty and food insecurity [3].

To address the land degradation and loss of soils, extensive watershed management practices were launched in Ethiopia, particularly after the famines of the 1970s. Since then, huge areas have been covered with terraces, bunds and millions of trees have been planted [4,5]. Even though a number of watershed management techniques were introduced to combat land degradation, the adoption of these practices remains below expectations.

Watershed management is a landscape-based strategy that aims to implement improved natural resources management systems for improving livelihoods and promoting beneficial conservation, sustainable use, and management of natural resources [6].

Gullele Botanical Garden is part of the Entoto mountain chain which has been predominantly covered by Eucalyptus globules since the early 19 th century. Mount Entoto largely has an undulating topography with steep slopes highly prone to severe runoff, causing soil erosion. From the early days of the garden soil and water conservation measures have been implemented using two methods: biological and physical [7].

Therefore; this study will help to assess watershed management practices and to generate recommendations that would assist in the further development and management of watersheds.

Statement of Problems


Degradation of vegetation cover and soil degradation are mainly caused by a lack of effective watershed management practices and inappropriate use and management of natural resources. For instance, over the last two decades, the governments of Ethiopia and its donor have spent significant sums on micro-watershed and macro-watershed rehabilitation and development. Most of these projects were not successful due to effective community participation, limited sense of responsibility over assets created; inefficient implementation of technologies, inadequate policies lack of integration among stakeholders, unmanageable planning units, and evaluation techniques for their feedback [8]. Poor watershed management practices seem to be responsible for land degradation.

Therefore; in Gullele Botanical Garden, watersheds like DAM A and around reserved forest site are among the watersheds that are severely affected by land degradation which includes soil erosion, nutrient depletion, and plantation cover. Gullele Botanical Garden has the landscape of watershed management and a source of ground water access for Addis Ababa city administration. So, empirical assessment of watershed management practices to be undertaken to identify the key watersheds problems and the root causes.

Questions


What is the problem of watershed management in Gullele Botanical Garden?

What are the root causes of watershed practices?

How to the conservation activities in Gullele Botanical Garden going on?

Is there a Systematic process of watershed management planning at Gullele Botanical Garden?

What are the watershed characteristics physical and biological in Gullele Botanical Garden?

Objectives


General objective

The general objective of this study will to assess watershed management practices and conservation activities at Gullele Botanical Garden, Addis Ababa.

Specific objectives

To identify the major factors affecting the watershed an Gullele Botanical Garden.

To evaluate conservation activities as response of ever expanding land Degradation through watershed management practice.

To generate a recommendation that would assist in the further development and management of the watershed.

Literature Review


Watershed management practices in Ethiopia

Watershed management practices implemented in rainfed regions are oriented largely toward rehabilitating degraded lands; protecting soil, water, and other natural resources to produced, forage, fiber, and other products; enhancing the flows of high-quality water from upland watersheds to downstream places of use [9]. While many land uses can occur on watersheds, natural resources production and environmental protection are equally important managerial objectives.

The Ethiopian government has for long time recognized the serious implication of continuing soil erosion to mitigate environmental degradation and as a result large national programs were implemented in the 1970s and 1980s. However the efforts of these initiatives were seen to be inadequate in managing the rapid rate of demographic growth within the country, widespread and increasing land degradation, and high risk of low rainfall and drought. Since 1980, the government has supported rural land rehabilitation, these aimed to implemented natural resources conservation and development programs in Ethiopia through watershed development [10].

The institutional strengthening watershed project in Ethiopia was implemented by FAO, and was principally aimed at capacity building of Ministry of Natural Resource’s technicians and experts and development agents in the highlands regions of the country. The projects used the sub-watershed as the planning unit and sought the views of local technicians and members of the farming community to prepare of land use and capability plans for soil and water conservation. This approach was tested at the pilot stage through FAO technical assistance under MOA during 1988-1991 [10].

Community participation in Watershed management

Participatory watershed development planning and management will be employed to improve the livelihoods of community/household/ in rural areas and optimizes the use of existing natural resources [11].

Environmental deterioration can best be reversed through involving local people directly with state, transforming the common experience of conflict into co-operation [12,13]. Government and NGOs have recognized that protection of watershed cannot be achieved without the willing participation of local people [14]. Therefore for successful and sustainable watershed management, people’s participation is essential. This is one of the lessons learned from the failures of centrally planned watershed development projects through which local people have been either forced to construct terracing, bunding, rehabilitating gullies and other technical measures that experts believed would cure watershed degradation [15-17].

Farmer’s participation is essential not only for implementation of soil and water conservation activities like terracing, bunding by food for work but also during planning of sustainable management of land and water resources. Farmers are closer to the real problems, and therefore they are aware of issues that experts may miss, and their objectives are more practical for economic development [18]. Furthermore, farmers participation in recommendation technology [19].

In most of the centrally planned projects, like Ethiopia, soil and water conservation programs are promoted with standard technical solutions such as terracing, contour bunding etc. on the assumption that soil conservation measures are universally applicable and local farmers are unaware of soil erosion and ignorant of its causes and consequences [10,20]. However, these measures, which were often forced on the people, may cause more erosion than their own indigenous practices, either because the new conservation works are not maintained or are technically less well adapted than existing practices [16].

The large majority of watershed development projects are based on rigid and convectional approaches considering only physical planning without attention to socio-economic or ecological conditions, for instance in Ethiopia in the 1980s the large Borkena Dam in south Wollo was constructed without considering ecological conditions of the area resulting in filling with silt and coarse material [10].

Material and Methods


Site descriptions

The Gullele Botanic Garden (GBG) is located in the north western part of the capital city Addis Ababa 4.3 km away from the centre. The geographical co-ordinate of the garden lies between latitude 8° 55' N and 9° 05' N and longitudes 38°05' E and 39°05' E (Figure 1). The Garden is mainly bordered with Oromia Regional state to the North and Addis Ababa, Gullele and kolfe Keranyo sub City to the South part. It belongs to the central plateau and dry evergreen agro-climatic zones of Ethiopia. Gullele botanic garden has two topographic landscape units or physiographic features. The northern half is a plain land while the southern half is mountainous, with a maximum elevation of 3000m above mean sea level. Two perennial watercourses originate from this mountainous area and flow southwards to the city centre. The garden is known by holding a number of Ethiopian endemic and indigenous plant species facing extinction and required protection. It is home to riverine vegetation’s and remnants of indigenous trees of the city of Addis Ababa.

GBG is aiming to collect living plants from the whole country to rescue threatened flora from extinction through enhancing biodiversity conservation, research, education and aesthetic values. Furthermore, the garden is intended to develop as a national and international standard representative of Ethiopian endemic and indigenous plants and offering scientists an array of rich plant collections to carrying out research on diverse species interaction, ecological dynamics and create an inspirational place for enjoyment and learning. Accordingly, the garden will supposed to intensifying indigenous knowledge for biodiversity conservation, climate change mitigation and urban greening option.

In Gullele Botanic Garden 1200 collected plant species were found. Out of this 166 are found to be medicinal plants. 65 species were found to be endemic to Ethiopia and Eritrea based on the flora of Ethiopia and Eritrea. Sixteen of them belong to herb, 37 shrubs, 22 trees, 4 shrub/tree, 1 herb/shrub and 1 climber. There are also 11 large mammals and 95 bird species were recorded from the garden, out of which one species of animals and one species of birds where endemic to Ethiopia [21].

Sampling methods

In this study area researchers will use a combination of purposive and random sampling techniques. The first steps will purposive selections of watershed areas namely DAM A and reserved forest sites.

The second stages will be the simple random sampling of area from the GBG. To facilitate this final stage, the list of names of specific area in each selecting area will select by researcher and the field extension officers of Gullele Botanical Garden.

Methods of data collection

Primary data will collect through structured interviews. Structured questionnaires will be used to collect primary data from soil conservation experts in the watershed. Additional information will also obtained from focus group discussion and key informant interviews with soil and water conservation leader. DEM data will be accessing from Google earth /landsat satellite image, using DEMs and raster data operations the watersheds and topographic features such as slopes, stream networks at Gullele Botanical Garden will be analyzed.

In field observation the physical resources and status of conservation measures within watershed will observe. Some physical soil and water conservation measures (stone bunds and cut-off drain) will practice in the watershed will observing and comparing with standard applicability parameters.

Secondary data will obtained from Gullele Botanical Garden office data, Books, study reports, student theses as well as published and unpublished documents of other organizations.

Data Analysis


For this particular study the researchers will used both quantitative and qualitative data analyzing methods. In this case of quantitative data analyzing methods, the primary data collected from household survey will present in figures, tables and percentages. In the case of qualitative data analyzing, the collected primary data will checked, arranged, processed and analyzed in R software and word spread sheet. Others GIS data models will be analyzed by using Arc mag 10.3 (Table 1 and Table 2).

Appendix


Questionnaires for water and soil conservation specialists

1. History of environment in general and the situation of watershed problems and their causes in particular.

2. The situation how individual or the experts are actively responding to these watershed problems.

3. The major constraints of the experts to implement watershed management activities in the area.

4. What are current watershed management practices in the area?, such as area closure, soil and water conservation practices, composting, tree planting and other land management activities.

5. What are the impacts that you think when these watershed techniques applied and how it caused?

6. About protection and maintenance activities after watershed management techniques (soil and water conservation activities) have been conducted.

7. The extent of participatory in palnning, designing, implementing monitoring, evaluating, and executing in the land magement decision in thus works?

References


  1. Assefa F (2009) Assessment of adoption behavior of soil and water conservation practices in the Koga watershed, highlands of Ethiopia. A thesis presented to the faculty of the grad school of cornell university master of professional studies.
  2. IFPRI (2005) (International Food Policy Research Institute), WUR (Wageningen University And Research Center) And EEPFE (Environmental Economics Policy Forum Of Ethiopia), Poverty And Land Degradation In Ethiopia: How To Reverse The Spiral?
  3. Zewde T (2012) Factors influencing land degradation in the Bilatte watershed: The case of Dimtu and Shelo sub-watersheds, Southern Ethiopia. A Thesis Submitted to School of graduate studies, Institute of Technology Department of Biosystem and Environmental Engineering. Hawassa University, Ethiopia.
  4. Herweg K (1993) 'Problems of acceptance and adoption of soil conservation in Ethiopia” Topics in Applied Resource Management 3: 391-411.
  5. Yeraswork A (2000) Twenty years to nowhere: Property rights, land management and conservation in Ethiopia. Lawrenceville, New Jersey: Red Sea Press.
  6. Bekele Tesemma A (2007) Profitable agro-forestry innovations for eastern Africa experience from agro-climatic zones of Ethiopia, India, Kenya Tanzania and Uganda. World Agro-forestry Centre (ICRF), Eastern Africa.
  7. Talemos S, Telake BB (2021) Gullele Botanic Garden, Addis Ababa (Ethiopia): Current status, challenges and opportunities.
  8. Habtamu T (2011) Assessment of sustainable watershed management approach case study Lencha Dima, Tsegur Eyesus and Dijjil Watershed. A project paper presented to the faculty of the graduate school of cornell university in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of master of professional studies.
  9. FAO (1986) Watershed management in Asia and Pacific: Needs and Opportunities for Active Participation Study report-FAO: RAS/85/017, FAO, Rome, 166.
  10. MOARD (2005) Guide line for integrated watershed management, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
  11. Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) (1995) Concepts and issues in watershed management, IDB, Washington DC.
  12. Erenso F (2021) Identification, characterization and valuation of eco-system services provided Gullele Botanical Garden, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
  13. Amhara National Regional State of the Federal Republic of Ethiopia (ANRSFRE) in collaboration with Global Environmental Facility (GEF) and International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) (2008) Community based integrated natural resource management in Lake Tana watershed, Ethiopia, 28.
  14. Jeffery R, Vira B (2001) Conflict and cooperation in participatory natural resource management, Palgrave.
  15. Dube D, Swatuk L (2002) Stakeholder participation in the new water management approach: A case study of the Save catchment, Zimbabwe, Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 27: 867-874.
  16. Pretty J, Ward H (2001) Social capital and the environment. World Development 29: 209-227.
  17. Kerr JM, Sanghi NK, Sriramappa G (1996) Subsidies in watershed development projects in India: Distortions and opportunities, Gatekeeper Series No. 61, International Institute for Environment and Development, London.
  18. Rhoades RE (1998) Participatory watershed research and management: where the shadow falls, Gatekeeper Series No.81, International Institute for Environment and Development, London.
  19. Stocking M (1996) Land management for sustainable development: Farmer’s participation In: Stocking M, (2001) Handbook for the field assessment of land degradation, Eathscan, London.
  20. Ashby J (1996) What do we mean by participatory research in agriculture: Participatory research and gender analysis for technology development, CIAT Publication No.294, Cali, Colombia.
  21. Johnston J (2001) Econometric Methods. Fourth edition, University of California, Irvine, 496.

Abstract


The study will be explore the prospects and approaches of watershed management practices of past and presents at Gullele Botanical Garden, Addis Ababa city administration, by assessing and evaluating the existing complex set of biophysical condition, conservation practices and identifying the key watershed problems as well as the root causes.

The information of the study will be gathered from official documents, direct observation, interview the office technician and experts. Then, the gather data will be analyzed both qualitative and quantitative as well as checked, arranged, processed and analyzed in R software and word sheet. Others GIS data models will be analyzed by using Arc mag 10.3.

It will be indicate, the DAM A and around reserved forest site watersheds, watershed management focuses only on soil and water conservation. Emphasis will be place on choice of technology for soil and water conservation measures. By use a combination of purposive and random sampling techniques and will obtain data from Gullele Botanical Garden office data, Books, study reports, student theses as well as published and unpublished documents of other organizations.

References

  1. Assefa F (2009) Assessment of adoption behavior of soil and water conservation practices in the Koga watershed, highlands of Ethiopia. A thesis presented to the faculty of the grad school of cornell university master of professional studies.
  2. IFPRI (2005) (International Food Policy Research Institute), WUR (Wageningen University And Research Center) And EEPFE (Environmental Economics Policy Forum Of Ethiopia), Poverty And Land Degradation In Ethiopia: How To Reverse The Spiral?
  3. Zewde T (2012) Factors influencing land degradation in the Bilatte watershed: The case of Dimtu and Shelo sub-watersheds, Southern Ethiopia. A Thesis Submitted to School of graduate studies, Institute of Technology Department of Biosystem and Environmental Engineering. Hawassa University, Ethiopia.
  4. Herweg K (1993) 'Problems of acceptance and adoption of soil conservation in Ethiopia” Topics in Applied Resource Management 3: 391-411.
  5. Yeraswork A (2000) Twenty years to nowhere: Property rights, land management and conservation in Ethiopia. Lawrenceville, New Jersey: Red Sea Press.
  6. Bekele Tesemma A (2007) Profitable agro-forestry innovations for eastern Africa experience from agro-climatic zones of Ethiopia, India, Kenya Tanzania and Uganda. World Agro-forestry Centre (ICRF), Eastern Africa.
  7. Talemos S, Telake BB (2021) Gullele Botanic Garden, Addis Ababa (Ethiopia): Current status, challenges and opportunities.
  8. Habtamu T (2011) Assessment of sustainable watershed management approach case study Lencha Dima, Tsegur Eyesus and Dijjil Watershed. A project paper presented to the faculty of the graduate school of cornell university in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of master of professional studies.
  9. FAO (1986) Watershed management in Asia and Pacific: Needs and Opportunities for Active Participation Study report-FAO: RAS/85/017, FAO, Rome, 166.
  10. MOARD (2005) Guide line for integrated watershed management, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
  11. Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) (1995) Concepts and issues in watershed management, IDB, Washington DC.
  12. Erenso F (2021) Identification, characterization and valuation of eco-system services provided Gullele Botanical Garden, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
  13. Amhara National Regional State of the Federal Republic of Ethiopia (ANRSFRE) in collaboration with Global Environmental Facility (GEF) and International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) (2008) Community based integrated natural resource management in Lake Tana watershed, Ethiopia, 28.
  14. Jeffery R, Vira B (2001) Conflict and cooperation in participatory natural resource management, Palgrave.
  15. Dube D, Swatuk L (2002) Stakeholder participation in the new water management approach: A case study of the Save catchment, Zimbabwe, Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 27: 867-874.
  16. Pretty J, Ward H (2001) Social capital and the environment. World Development 29: 209-227.
  17. Kerr JM, Sanghi NK, Sriramappa G (1996) Subsidies in watershed development projects in India: Distortions and opportunities, Gatekeeper Series No. 61, International Institute for Environment and Development, London.
  18. Rhoades RE (1998) Participatory watershed research and management: where the shadow falls, Gatekeeper Series No.81, International Institute for Environment and Development, London.
  19. Stocking M (1996) Land management for sustainable development: Farmer’s participation In: Stocking M, (2001) Handbook for the field assessment of land degradation, Eathscan, London.
  20. Ashby J (1996) What do we mean by participatory research in agriculture: Participatory research and gender analysis for technology development, CIAT Publication No.294, Cali, Colombia.
  21. Johnston J (2001) Econometric Methods. Fourth edition, University of California, Irvine, 496.