Table 4: Efficacy of commercial treatments for anthracnose control.
|
Treatment |
Severity in untreated fruita |
Percent efficacyb |
|
Preventive sprays in the field (benomyl + copper oxychloride)
|
5.1 |
58 |
|
Preventive sprays in the field (benomyl + mancozeb)
|
6.4 |
89 |
|
Preventive sprays in the field (benomyl + mancozeb)
|
11.5 |
92.5 |
|
Preventive sprays in the field (ferbam + copper hydroxide)
|
12.9 |
92.7 |
|
Eradicant sprays in the field (750 ppm prochloraz, following six low-level infection periods)c
|
1.15 |
69.6 |
|
Postharvest dip in the water, 53 °C, 3 min |
0.514 |
82.1 |
|
Postharvest dip in the water, 53 °C, 3 min
|
12.5 |
48.3 |
|
Postharvest dip in 750 ppm prochloraz, ambient temperature
|
12.5 |
94 |
|
Postharvest dip in 750 ppm prochloraz, ambient temperature
|
27.7 |
43.2 |
|
Postharvest dip in 250 ppm prochloraz, 53 °C, 3 min
|
0.514 |
98.8 |
|
Postharvest dip in 250 ppm prochloraz, 53 °C, 3 min
|
12.5 |
98.5 |
|
Postharvest dip in 500 ppm prochloraz, 53 °C, 3 min
|
27.7 |
96.6 |
|
aAverage percent fruit area diseased. bPercent disease reduction relative to control. cEstimated 10% of conidia forming dark appressoria, according to the model developed by [28]. |
||