Table 4: Efficacy of commercial treatments for anthracnose control.

Treatment

Severity in untreated fruita

Percent efficacyb

Preventive sprays in the field (benomyl + copper oxychloride)

 

5.1

58

Preventive sprays in the field (benomyl + mancozeb)

 

6.4

89

Preventive sprays in the field (benomyl + mancozeb)

 

11.5

92.5

Preventive sprays in the field (ferbam + copper hydroxide)

 

12.9

92.7

Eradicant sprays in the field (750 ppm prochloraz, following six low-level infection periods)c

 

1.15

69.6

Postharvest dip in the water, 53 °C, 3 min

0.514

82.1

Postharvest dip in the water, 53 °C, 3 min

 

12.5

48.3

Postharvest dip in 750 ppm prochloraz, ambient temperature

 

12.5

94

Postharvest dip in 750 ppm prochloraz, ambient temperature

 

27.7

43.2

Postharvest dip in 250 ppm prochloraz, 53 °C, 3 min

 

0.514

98.8

Postharvest dip in 250 ppm prochloraz, 53 °C, 3 min

 

12.5

98.5

Postharvest dip in 500 ppm prochloraz, 53 °C, 3 min

 

27.7

96.6

aAverage percent fruit area diseased. bPercent disease reduction relative to control.

cEstimated 10% of conidia forming dark appressoria, according to the model developed by [28].