Table 3: Correlation between strength grip and ENMG; therapeutics aspects, Functional limitations.
|
Prognosis Factors |
Forms of CTS/Strenght Grip (%) |
p |
||||
|
Normal |
Minimal |
Moderate |
Severe |
|
||
|
BCTQS |
[1-2] |
83.3 |
66.7 |
62.5 |
25 |
0.035 |
|
[2-3] |
16.7 |
26.7 |
0 |
75 |
|
|
|
[3-5] |
0 |
6.7 |
37.5 |
0 |
|
|
|
rTCNV |
No |
0 |
62.7 |
0 |
33.3 |
0.025 |
|
Minimal |
50 |
25 |
25 |
0 |
|
|
|
Moderate |
33 |
0 |
66.7 |
0 |
|
|
|
Severe |
0 |
61.1 |
22.2 |
16.7 |
|
|
|
dDML |
No |
0 |
6.7 |
0 |
25 |
0.312 |
|
Minimal |
83.3 |
33.3 |
62.5 |
25 |
||
|
Moderate |
0 |
26.7 |
0 |
25 |
||
|
Severe |
16.7 |
33.3 |
37.5 |
25 |
||
|
TTT |
Conservator |
66.7 |
33.3 |
0 |
0 |
0.134 |
|
Surgery |
13.3 |
46.7 |
26.7 |
13.3 |
||
BCTQS: Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionaaire Score; rTCNV: Reduced Velocity Trans-Carpal Tune; dDML: differential of Distal Motor Latency of Median Nerve; TTT: Treatment