Table 3: Descriptive statistics for the statements of evaluation categories.
Categories and statements |
Range |
M1 |
SD2 |
OBJECTIVES |
|
|
|
The objectives of the scenario are clear. |
2-4 |
3.6 |
0.5 |
The objectives of the scenario are realistic. |
3-4 |
3.9 |
0.7 |
The objectives of the simulation describe the desired skills and behaviour of the students during the simulation. |
3-4 |
3.7 |
0.5 |
The difficulty level of the objectives is suitable for the students’ level of competency and education. |
1-4 |
3.8 |
0.6 |
The objectives are measurable. |
3-4 |
3.9 |
0.4 |
The objectives support and assist students in reaching the study course learning objectives/goals. |
4-4 |
4.0 |
0.0 |
BRIEFING |
|
|
|
There is relevant study material available to enable the students to prepare for the simulation. |
2-4 |
3.8 |
0.5 |
Briefing provides a clear understanding of the scenario objectives and patient case. |
1-4 |
3.7 |
0.7 |
The scenario environment and context descriptions are clear. |
2-4 |
3.7 |
0.5 |
The actors’ roles are clear. |
3-4 |
3.9 |
0.3 |
The observers' tasks are clear. |
2-4 |
3.7 |
0.6 |
DESCRIPTION OF THE SIMULATION ENVIRONMENT |
|
|
|
The context of the scenario is described clearly (e.g., what, were, when and who). |
3-4 |
3.9 |
0.2 |
The scenario is described in a way with enough environmental aspects (e.g., staging, equipment, tools, clothing, medication) which helps make the scenario realistic. |
3-4 |
3.4 |
1.0 |
DESCRIPTION OF THE PATIENT CASE |
|
|
|
The patient’s background information is described realistically/ diversely. |
3-4 |
3.9 |
0.3 |
The patient’s current state is described realistically/diversely. |
3-4 |
3.9 |
0.3 |
PROGRESS OF THE SIMULATION |
|
|
|
The scenario presents changing situations. e.g., changes in the patient’s condition, which require the students to act and make decisions. |
1-4 |
2.5 |
1.3 |
The scenario provides information about issues such as the patient’s vital functions, results of laboratory tests or functional capacity that support the observation of changes in the patient's condition. |
1-4 |
2.8 |
1.1 |
The scenario includes scripted tips, cues etc. that support the students in reaching their learning objectives. |
1-4 |
2.5 |
1.2 |
OPTIMAL FLOW OF THE SCENARIO AND CLOSING CRITERIA |
|
|
|
The scenario clearly describes the closing criteria, such as the patient’s status and environmental factors at the end of the simulation. |
1-4 |
3.5 |
0.9 |
The progress of the scenario follows evidence-based background/ information (e.g. literature source mentioned in the scenario script). |
1-4 |
2.3 |
1.5 |
DEBRIEFING |
|
|
|
There is a written plan for the debriefing. |
1-4 |
2.6 |
1.3 |
The debriefing is based on some of the debriefing models that ensure appropriate, fair, and structured reflection. |
1-4 |
2.8 |
1.2 |
The plan for the debriefing is based on the scenario objectives. |
1-4 |
1.3 |
0.9 |
Open questions have been drawn up for the debriefing. |
1-4 |
2.2 |
1.2 |
The duration of the debriefing is about 2-3 times the duration of the simulation. |
1-4 |
1.1 |
0.5 |
TIMETABLE |
|
|
|
The timing of the simulation is in accordance with the simulation pedagogy. |
1-1 |
1.0 |
0.0 |
1Mean, 2Standard Deviation of mean