Table 1: Evolution during time of the anchors materials.
Material |
Features |
IN VIVO Reaction |
METAL |
· Easy to assess changes on conventional X-ray · Greater pull-out strength |
High biocompatibility; Difficult in revision case Interference with MRI |
PGA |
· Bioabsorbable · Rapid resorption |
Hydrolysis of the polymer, cleared by local macrophages which resulted in lytic bone changes |
PLLA |
· Bio absorbable · Slow resorption (up to 5 years) |
Change in molecular weight and crystallinity, reduction mechanical properties of the anchor and failure due to breakdown |
TCP |
· Bio absorbable · Mineral content similar to the natural bone |
Macroporosity and microporosity conducive to osteoconductivity, compressive strength, dissolution, and biocompatibility |
PEEK |
· Non-biodegradable · Resistant to chemical, thermal and radiant agents |
Inert; High strength, radiolucent can be drilled out in revision cases |
ALL-SUTURE |
· Soft · Small size · A minor removal of the bone during the creation of the pilot hole · Reducing the risk of pullout |
Reduced risk of adverse reactions; non interference with MRI; less complex revisions |
PGA : Polyglycolic Acid, PLLA: Polylactic Acid, TCP: Tricalcium Phosphate, PEEK: Polyetheretherketone