Table 1: Total percentage distribution of individually housed starved Zebrafish in each colored arm of the T-maze tank during 30 minutes of recording.
| Type 1 | Type 2 | Type 1 | Type 2 | Type 1 | Type 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starved fish control (type 1, N = 18) and (type 2, N = 18) without food in T-Maze (Showing Type 1 swimming pattern) |
25 ± 3 [F = 5,30 = 0.833, P = 0.53] |
25 ± 5 [F = 5,30 = 0.19,P = 0.97] |
3.6 ± 2.6 [F = 5,30 = 0.63,P = 0.68] |
4 ± 3 [F = 5,30 = 0.45,P = 0.81] |
71.9 ± 5.4 [F = 5,30 = 0.86,P = 0.82] |
71 ± 4 [F = 5,30 = 0.5,P = 0.78] |
| Between Type 1 and 2 [F = 1,70 = 0.24, p = 0.62] |
Between Type 1 and 2 [F = 1,70 = 0.69, p = 0.41] |
Between Type 1 and 2 [F = 1,70 = 0.25, p = 0.62] |
||||
| Starved fish type 2 fish (N = 18) with food in the green arm (Showing predominant Type 1 swimming pattern) |
51.75 ± 3.9 [F = 5,30 = 0.29, p = 0.91] |
4.4 ± 2.91 [F = 5,30 = 0.51, p = 0.76] |
45.2 ± 9.3 [F = 5,30 = 0.70, p = 0.63] |
|||
| Between green and red arm [F = 1,70 = 4188.9, p < 0.001] |
Between red arm and tail [F = 1,70 = 623.1, p < 0.001] |
Between green arm and tail [F = 1,70 = 14.6, p = 0.0003] |
||||
| Starved fish (type 2, N = 18) with food red side (Type 2 shifting to Type 3 swimming pattern) |
32.5 ± 4.6 [F = 5,12 = 2.73, p = 0.07] |
22.3 ± 7.6 [F = 5,12 = 0.71, p = 0.63] |
46.9 ± 9.7 [F = 5,12 = 1.32, p = 0.32] |
|||
| Between green and red arm [F = 1,34 = 24.2, p < 0.001 |
Between red arm and tail [F = 1,34 = 71.69, p < 0.001] |
Between green arm and tail [F = 1, 34 = 32.2, p < 0.001] |
||||
(Value expressed as Mean ± SD of 6 consecutive recording with 6 fish of type 1 and 2 in triplicate; Different treatment groups have different set of 6 fish of each type in triplicate).