Table 3: Non-obstructive azoospermia.
Study |
Outcome Measure |
Findings |
Meta-analysis |
Fertilization Rate |
No statistical difference between fresh versus frozen-thawed testicular sperm (RR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.92-1.02) |
Meta-analysis |
Clinical Pregnancy Rate (CPR) |
No statistical difference between fresh versus frozen-thawed testicular sperm (RR = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.75-1.33) |
Kalsi, et al. (2010) |
Pregnancy Rate |
Better results with frozen-thawed testicular sperm regarding pregnancy rates (57.1% versus 36.6%, P < 0.05) |
Kalsi, et al. (2010) |
Live Birth Rate (LBR) |
Better results with frozen-thawed testicular sperm regarding LBR (57.1 versus 31.7%, P < 0.05) |
Kalsi, et al. (2010) |
Miscarriage Rate |
Lower miscarriage rates with frozen-thawed testicular sperm (0% versus 13.3%, P < 0.05) |
Aoki, et al. (2004) |
Clinical Pregnancy Rate (CPR) |
Higher clinical pregnancy rate with fresh testicular sperm compared to frozen-thawed (48.7% vs. 31.2%; P < 0.05) |
Aoki, et al. (2004) |
Fertilization Rate |
Better fertilization rate with frozen-thawed specimen (76.5 ± 2.6 versus 68.3 ± 3.1, P < 0.05) |
Aoki, et al. (2004) |
Delivery Rate |
Significantly higher delivery rates with fresh testicular sperm compared to frozen-thawed (48.7% vs. 31.2%; P < 0.05) |
Aoki, et al. (2004) |
Miscarriage Rate |
Significantly lower miscarriage rate with fresh testicular sperm compared to frozen-thawed (21.7% vs. 33.3%; P < 0.05) |
Schachter-Safran, et al. (2017) |
Various |
No significant difference in fertilization rate, implantation rate, number of embryos transferred, pregnancy rate, or LBR between fresh and frozen-thawed sperm |