Table 1: Summary of included studies, characteristics of participants and utilized nutritional screening tools.
|
Author (Date) |
Sample size (% Male) |
Study design |
Nutritional measure |
Group definition (number of patients) |
Age (mean ± SD) |
Malnutrition prevalence |
Result |
Conclusion |
1 |
Alikiaii B, et al. (2021) [10] |
73 (63%) |
Cross-sectional |
NRS-2002 in ICU setting |
Score = 3 (12) |
45 ± 16.2 |
30 (41.1%) |
NRS correlated with albumin (g/dl): (3.2 ± 0.5; r = -2.3, p = 0.050) Daily calorie intake (kcal): 1992.7 ± 378.8; r = -0.352, p = 0.002 MAC (NS) |
NRS correlated with: serum albumin
|
Score = 4 (31) |
55.8 ± 16.8 |
||||||||
Score ≥ 5 (30) |
67.7 ± 17.9 |
||||||||
2 |
Allard L, et al. (2020) [19]
|
108 (59.3%) |
Retrospective observation |
-BMI, weight loss |
No malnutrition (66) |
62.7 ± 14.9 |
42 (38.9%) |
CRP, ferritin, fibrinogen, Il-6, LDH, and Procalcitonin means did not show significant difference between groups Regrouped by NRI: were higher than those who were not at risk of malnutrition.
CRP (mg/L): 90 ± 90 vs. 17 ± 24, p < 0.01 fibrinogen (g/L): 5.5 ± 1.5 vs. 3.8 ± 1.4, p < 0.01 procalcitonin (ng/ml): 0.9 ± 3.3 vs. 0.1 ± 0.1, p < 0.01 |
No association |
Malnutrition (42) |
66.1 ± 15.3 |
||||||||
3 |
Bedock D, et al. (2020) [18] |
114 (60.5%) |
Longitudinal Observation |
GLIM criteria: -BMI, weight loss, decreased dietary intake |
No malnutrition (66) |
58.4 ± 15.2 |
48 (42.1%) |
Peripheral lymphocyte count (109/L) was higher in malnourished patients (1.45 ± 0.62; p = 0.04) BMI was lower in severe malnutrition than moderate malnutrition and no malnutrition groups:(23.3 ± 5.3 vs. (26.3 ± 4.1) and (27.9 ± 4.9), p < 0.01
|
Malnutrition detected by anthropometric measures associated with peripheral lymphocyte count |
Moderate malnutrition (27) |
61.1 ± 16.6 |
||||||||
Sever malnutrition (21) |
63.0 ± 17.1 |
||||||||
4 |
Cui N, et al. (2021) [21] |
408 (51.5%) |
Retrospective observational |
Prealbumin (nl.150-400 mg/L |
Normal level (183) Low level (225) |
63.2 ± 12.3 |
225 (55.1%)
|
Low prealbumin group had stronger Inflammatory response median (IQR): CRP (mg/L): [56.2 (26.9-89.0) vs. 4.83 (1.41-16.2); p < 0.001] IL-6 (pg/ml): 7.37 (4.04-17.0) vs. 4.49 (3.17-7.04); p < 0.014 Procalcitonin (ng/ml): 0.10 (0.06-0.21) vs. 0.06 (0.04-0.09); p < 0.001 Lymphocyte count (109/L): [0.83 (0.58-1.08) vs. 1.28 (0.92-1.62); p < 0.001] higher mean NRS score: 3.27 6 ± 0.86 vs. 3.66 ± 61.08; p < 0.001 lower serum albumin (g/L): ([29.5 (26.0-32.7) vs. 32.3 (29.5-35.6); p < 0.001] |
Prealbumin associated with NRS and inflammatory markers
|
5 |
Czapla M, et al. (2021) [11] |
286 (67.8%) |
Retrospective observation |
NRS-2002- in ICU setting |
Score < 3 (28) |
57.3 ± 13.2 |
258 (90.2%) |
Study groups did not show difference in albumin, BMI, CRP, Procalcitonin, and peripheral lymphocyte percentage means |
No association |
Score ≥ 3 (258) |
60.8 ± 13.2 |
||||||||
6 |
Del Giorno R, et al. (2020) [9] |
90 (67.8%) |
Retrospective observation |
NRS-2002 BIA |
NRS-2002: At nutritional risk (83) |
64.5 ± 13.7 |
83 (92.2%) |
NRS significantly associated with loss of appetite (OR = 3.07 (1.65-5.68); p < 0.001)
|
Not reported |
7 |
Ekinci I, et al. (2021) [20] |
282 (52.1%) |
Retrospective cross-section |
PNI |
Score ≥ 45 (159) |
53.5 ± 15 |
123 (43.6%) |
High score group showed higher levels of the followings: CRP (mg/L) 73.1 ± 64.16 vs. 43.83 ± 53.95; p < 0.001 Procalcitonin (mg/ml): .31 ± 0.97 vs. 0.12 ± 0.46; p < 0.001 D-dimer(mg/L): 2.13 ± 5.11 vs. 1.22 ± 4.04; p < 0.001 Fibrinogen (mg/dL): 458.31 ± 165.79 vs. 409.49 ± 123.19, p = 0.016 Ferritin (mg/mL): 596.3 ± 1321.27 vs. 305.24 ± 313.43, p < 0.001. |
|
Score < 45 (123) |
60.2 ± 15 |
||||||||
8 |
Kosovali BD, et al. (2021) [13] |
690 (54.9%) |
Retrospective observation |
PNI- in ICU setting |
Score ≥ 43 (208) |
67.9 ± 15.1 |
482 (69.9%) |
Median (min-Max) of following markers were significantly different between those with lower vs higher PNI score AST(U/L): [50 (4-11824) vs. 39.5 (3-321); p < 0.001] CRP (g/L): [0.139 (0.001-0.621) vs. 0.091 (0.077-0.764); p < 0.001] D-dimer(mg/L): [2 (0.3-80) vs. 1.18 (0.2-47); p < 0.001] Ferritin(µg/L): [683.5 (22-126386) vs. 295.5 (8-4837); p < 0.001] fibrinogen level (g/L) was higher in those with lower PNI: 5.16 (0.5-9); p = 0.028 IL-6 (pg /ml): [65.9 (2-1000) vs. 49.2 (3.93-1688); p < 0.001] Procalcitonin (µg/L): [0.27 (0.03-511.41) vs. 0.11 (0.005-57.19); p < 0.001] BMI (NS)
|
No association
|
Score ≤ 42 (482) |
69.8 ± 13.4 |
||||||||
9 |
Kupeli I, et al. (2020) [16] |
20 (65%) |
Case series |
NRS-2002- in ICU setting |
NRS score < 5 (3) |
75.5 ± 8.7 |
17 (85.0%) |
All patients had low albumin (g/L) (29.7 ± 5.3) |
Not reported |
NRS score ≥ 5 (17) |
|||||||||
10 |
Li T, et al. (2020) [5] |
182 (35.7%) |
Cross-sectional |
MNA |
Group 1: score ≥ 24 (36) |
68.1 ± 8.1 |
96 (52.7%) |
Nutritional status by anthropometric measures associated with lymphocyte count level: (X2: 11.237, p < 0.001) Albumin level: [OR = 2.98(CI: 243-5.19); p = 0.005], X2 = 10.217, p < 0.001 BMI: (21.1 ± 3.6) vs. (25.6 ± 3.0) , p = 0.035 |
Associated with lymphocyte count and serum albumin |
Group 2: score 17-23.5 (50) |
69.5 ± 7.3 |
||||||||
Group 3: score < 17 (96) |
69.8 ± 8.2 |
||||||||
11 |
Liu A, et al. (2021) [17] |
760 (50%) |
Cross-sectional |
NRS-2002 |
NRS score < 3 (132) |
49 (38,70) |
628 (82.6%) |
Those with higher score had lower BMI: 24.3 ± 2 vs. 23.5 ± 2; p = 0.029 NRS score correlated with: Serum albumin(g/L): OR = [3.61(CI: 2.23-5.84); p < 0.001] Prealbumin (mg/L): OR = [2.88 (CI: 1.04-8.00); P = 0.042] |
NRS-2002 associated with serum albumin and prealbumin |
NRS score ≥ 3 (628) |
64 (56, 71) |
||||||||
12 |
Liu G, et al. (2020) [12] |
141 (48.2%) |
Retrospective cohort |
NRS-2002 MUST, MNA, NRI |
Normal (21)
|
70.5 ± 4.6
|
120 (85.1%) |
NRS significantly agreed with NRI (k = 0.491 (0.328-0.653); p < 0.001) and other anthropometric nutritional measures (MUST: p < 0.001; MNA-sf: p < 0.001) NRI score associated with Albumin (g/L): (33.8 ± 2.9 vs 39.8 ± 2.4; p < 0.001) Loss of appetite frequency (p < 0.022) BMI (NS) |
NRS-2002 associated with albumin
|
Nutritional risk (120) |
71.9 ± 6.0 |
||||||||
13 |
Liu H, et al. (2021) [8] |
47 (48.9%) |
prospective observation |
SGA
|
Normal (21) |
63.4 ± 2.9 |
8 (17%) |
Malnutrition associated with: BMI (17.7 ± 1.3; p < 0.001). serum albumin g/L (31.9 ± 2.2 vs. 36.6 ± 1.0; p = 0.019) serum IL-6 (/ml): 30.7 ± 7.1 vs. 9.8 ± 3.4, p = 0.016 Low lymphocyte count (109/L): (0.7 ± 0.2; p = 0.025) peripheral blood CD8+ %: 15.9 ± 2.9 vs. 23.2 ± 1.5, p = 0.027 CRP (NS) |
SGA associated with albumin, IL-6, lymphocyte count |
risk of malnutrition (18) |
65.4 ± 3.1 |
||||||||
Malnourished (8) |
67.6 ± 5.9 |
||||||||
14 |
Nicolau J, et al. (2021) [2] |
75 (54.7%) |
Cross-sectional |
SGA |
Normal (48) |
49 ± 15.1 |
27 (36.0%) |
Malnourished group showed more severe inflammatory response: D-dimer (ng/ml): 1516.9 ± 1466.9 vs. 461.1 ± 353. 7; p < 0.0001 Ferritin (µg/l): 847.8 ± 741.1 vs. 617.8 ± 598.7; p = 0.03 CRP (mg/l): 127.8 ± 115.6 vs. 59.2 ± 63.8; p = 0.04 Procalcitonin (ng/ml): 1.5 ± 1.1 vs. 0.8 ± 0.2; p = 0.005 serum albumin (g/dl): 3.2 ± .7 vs. 4.1 ±. 5; p = 0.0001 Lymphocyte count and Fibrinogen (NS) BMI (NS)
|
SGA associated with inflammatory markers: CRP, ferritin, procalcitonin, serum albumin, D-dimer
|
Malnourished (27) |
65 ± 14.1 |
||||||||
15 |
Wang R, et al. (2020) [3] |
450 (45.8%) |
Prospective observation |
PNI |
Survivors |
55 (38-67) |
|
PNI score showed significant correlation with mortality |
|
Non-survivors |
71 (63-78) |
||||||||
16 |
ZhouJ, et al. (2020) [6] |
429 (49.4%) |
Retrospective observational study |
CONUT |
Score: 0-4 (147) Score: 5-12 (282) |
> 61: 41 (27.9%) 166 (58.9%) |
282 (65.7%) |
No correlation with Lymphocyte count, CRP, Procalcitonin, BMI, serum albumin, or LDH
|
No association |
Abbreviations of nutritional screening tools: CONUT: Controlling Nutritional Status; GLIM: Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition; MNA-sf: Mini Nutritional Assessment-short form; MUST: Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool is based on BMI, weight loss, and impact of an acute disease; NRI: Nutrition Risk Index; NRS-2002: Nutritional Risk Screening 2002, PNI: Prognostic Nutritional Index; SGA: Subjective Global Assessment. NS: Non-significant.