Table 3: Varietal selection criteria and the average scores given by the agro pastoralists.
|
Variety |
Agro pastoralist selection criteria |
Total score |
Average |
Rank |
|||||
|
Earliness |
Seed colour |
Biomass yield |
Grain yield |
Field performance |
Lodging tolerance |
||||
|
Dagiem |
4.5 |
4.5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
29 |
4.8 |
1 |
|
Areka-1 |
4 |
4.5 |
4 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
27.5 |
4.6 |
2 |
|
Washara |
4 |
4.5 |
4.5 |
4.5 |
4.5 |
4.5 |
26.5 |
4.4 |
3 |
|
Mena |
4 |
4 |
4.5 |
4.5 |
4.5 |
4.5 |
26 |
4.3 |
4 |
|
Neguse |
4.5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4.5 |
4 |
25 |
4.2 |
5 |
|
Ebba |
4.5 |
4.5 |
3.5 |
4 |
4.5 |
3.5 |
24.5 |
4.1 |
6 |
|
Hiberande |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
22.5 |
3.8 |
7 |
|
Tesfa |
4.5 |
4.5 |
3 |
3 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
22 |
3.7 |
8 |
|
Bora |
4 |
4 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
20 |
3.3 |
9 |
|
Felagot |
4.5 |
4 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
3 |
19 |
3.2 |
10 |
|
Jitu |
3 |
4 |
3 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
17.5 |
2.9 |
11 |
|
Abola |
4.5 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
2.5 |
2 |
17 |
2.8 |
12 |
|
Local check |
2.5 |
3 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
15.5 |
2.6 |
13 |
NB: number of participant (n = 30) and the performance scale given for varietal selection was 1-5 scale (5 = excellent, 4 = very good, 3 = good, 2 = poor, 1= very poor).