Table 6: Pairwise comparison matrix, AHP factor weights, consistency ratio of the ten SWOT indicators and rank.

Criterion

N1

N2

N3

S1

S2

S3

E1

E2

G1

G2

Criteria

Weighted sum

AHP

Enhance biodiversity and ecosystem (N1)

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.001

0.000

0.001

0.020

0.004

0.196

Establish buffer zone and create connectivity (N2)

0.006

0.001

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.001

0.000

0.002

0.001

0.001

0.035

0.012

0.353

Boundary expansion to protect surrounding areas (N3)

0.006

0.008

0.001

0.000

0.000

0.001

0.001

0.001

0.000

0.002

0.046

0.021

0.457

Improve participation and awareness of locals (S1)

0.010

0.010

0.010

0.002

0.000

0.001

0.001

0.001

0.001

0.007

0.066

0.043

0.659

Integration of cultural/ religious amenities and incorporate bylaws (S2)

0.007

0.005

0.008

0.010

0.003

0.001

0.001

0.001

0.003

0.010

0.068

0.047

0.685

Reduce human wildlife conflict (S3)

0.009

0.008

0.013

0.025

0.029

0.011

0.003

0.005

0.005

0.017

0.111

0.123

1.111

Improve tourism infrastructure (E1)

0.015

0.012

0.010

0.018

0.024

0.022

0.006

0.001

0.005

0.005

0.108

0.117

1.083

Enhance direct economic opportunity (E2)

0.008

0.007

0.023

0.021

0.043

0.029

0.056

0.013

0.006

0.007

0.146

0.214

1.463

Strengthened law enforcement (G1)

0.010

0.018

0.026

0.026

0.010

0.026

0.014

0.024

0.011

0.005

0.130

0.170

1.302

Improved integration among key actors (G2)

0.021

0.055

0.036

0.023

0.020

0.054

0.102

0.148

0.184

0.082

0.269

0.724

2.692

ʎmax

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

Consistency index

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-1

Random index (constant)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.49

Consistency Ratio

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-0.671