Table 2: Economic analysis of durum wheat as influenced by nitrogen and sulphur fertilization at sinana station.
|
N |
S |
GY |
AGY |
UnGFB |
PC |
AGFB |
UC |
GC |
AC |
TVC |
UnNB |
ANB |
|
0 |
0 |
2438.88 |
2194.99 |
13,170 |
11.6 |
15,584 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
- |
13,170 |
15,584 |
|
0 |
15 |
2530.68 |
2277.61 |
13,666 |
10.5 |
13,666 |
0 |
286.52 |
25 |
312 |
13,354 |
13,354 D |
|
0 |
30 |
2444.73 |
2200.26 |
13,202 |
11.1 |
14,522 |
0 |
573.04 |
50 |
623 |
12,579 D |
13,899 |
|
0 |
45 |
2626.97 |
2364.27 |
14,186 |
11.5 |
16,550 |
0 |
859.56 |
75 |
935 |
13,251 |
15,615 |
|
0 |
60 |
2465.36 |
2218.82 |
13,313 |
10.7 |
13,757 |
0 |
1146.08 |
90 |
1,236 |
12,077 D |
12,521 D |
|
60 |
0 |
3072.57 |
2765.31 |
16,592 |
12.4 |
21,846 |
1695.65 |
0 |
25 |
1,721 |
14,871 |
20,125 |
|
60 |
15 |
2632.56 |
2369.30 |
14,216 |
12.0 |
17,770 |
1695.65 |
286.52 |
50 |
2,032 |
12,184 D |
15,738 D |
|
60 |
30 |
3061.21 |
2755.09 |
16,531 |
12.8 |
22,867 |
1695.65 |
573.04 |
75 |
2,344 |
14,187 |
20,524 |
|
60 |
45 |
3201.66 |
2881.49 |
17,289 |
12.8 |
23,916 |
1695.65 |
859.56 |
90 |
2,645 |
14,644 |
21,271 |
|
60 |
60 |
3144.18 |
2829.76 |
16,979 |
12.3 |
22,072 |
1695.65 |
1146.08 |
115 |
2,957 |
14,022 D |
19,115 D |
|
120 |
0 |
3046.94 |
2742.25 |
16,453 |
12.0 |
20,704 |
3391.3 |
0 |
50 |
3,441 |
13,012 D |
17,263 D |
|
120 |
15 |
3442.02 |
3097.82 |
18,587 |
12.1 |
23,729 |
3391.3 |
286.52 |
75 |
3,753 |
14,834 |
19,976 |
|
120 |
30 |
3068.77 |
2761.89 |
16,571 |
12.6 |
22,371 |
3391.3 |
573.04 |
100 |
4,064 |
12,507 D |
18,307 D |
|
120 |
45 |
3083.36 |
2775.02 |
16,650 |
12.3 |
21,645 |
3391.3 |
859.56 |
125 |
4,376 |
12,274 D |
17,269 D |
|
120 |
60 |
3230.9 |
2907.81 |
17,447 |
13.2 |
25,298 |
3391.3 |
1146.08 |
150 |
4,687 |
12,759 |
20,611 |
|
180 |
0 |
3407.78 |
3067.00 |
18,402 |
13.8 |
28,523 |
5086.95 |
0 |
75 |
5,162 |
13,240 |
23,361 |
|
180 |
15 |
3441.71 |
3097.54 |
18,585 |
13.1 |
26,639 |
5086.95 |
286.52 |
90 |
5,463 |
13,122 D |
21,175 D |
|
180 |
30 |
3427.17 |
3084.45 |
18,507 |
13.2 |
26,835 |
5086.95 |
573.04 |
115 |
5,775 |
12,732 D |
21,060 D |
|
180 |
45 |
3202.53 |
2882.28 |
17,294 |
13.7 |
26,517 |
5086.95 |
859.56 |
140 |
6,087 |
11,207 D |
20,430 D |
|
180 |
60 |
3446.73 |
3102.06 |
18,612 |
13.9 |
29,159 |
5086.95 |
1146.08 |
165 |
6,398 |
12,214 |
22,761 |
N = Nitrogen (Kg ha-1); S= Sulfur (Kg ha-1); GY = Grain Yield (Kg ha-1); AGY = Adjusted Grain Yield Down to 10%; UnGFB = Gross Field Benefit (Birr ha-1) without premium price; PC = Protein Content (%); AGFB = Gross Field Benefit (Birr ha-1) with premium price based on protein content; UC = Cost of Urea; GC = Cost of Gypsum (ETB); AC= Cost of Application (ETB); TVC= Total Variable Cost (Birr ha-1); D = Dominated Technology