Table 4: The intensity profile of silicon inclusions (in relative units) in cell walls of the leaf epidermis of Q. robur shaded trees (No. 1 and No. 2) and unshaded trees (No. 3 and No. 4); data are means ± SD of three replicates; 30-35 cells of each type in the epidermis were used in each replicate. asignifies notable variations in the factors of tree No. 1 (with shading) from tree No. 3 (without shading) (P ≤ 0.05); bindicates substantial divergences in the variables of tree No. 2 (with shading) from tree No. 3 (without shading) (P ≤ 0. 05); cshows noteworthy differences in the parameters of tree No. 1 (with shading) from tree No. 4 (without shading) (P ≤ 0.05); ddenotes noteworthy disparities in the parameters of tree No. 2 (with shading) from tree No. 4 (without shading) (P ≤ 0.05).

Parameter

The intensity profile of silicon fluorescence in the leaf of oak four trees, relative units

 

Tree No.1

Tree No. 2

Tree No. 3

Tree No. 4

Adaxial epidermis

 

 

 

 

Anticlinal wall of pavement cells

120 ± 13.0

105 ± 11.0

140 ± 12b

145 ± 13c,d

 Periclinal wall of pavement cells

70 ± 5.3

55 ± 4.3

124 ± 11a,b

115 ± 12c,d

Trichome

Absent

Absent

Absent

Absent

Stomata

Absent

Absent

Absent

Absent

Abaxial epidermis

 

 

 

 

Anticlinal wall of pavement cells

75 ± 8.8

80 ± 9.3

100 ± 9.7a,b

120 ± 11c,d

Periclinal wall of pavement cells

70 ± 5.3

23 ± 1.7

82 ± 5.4a,b

95 ± 7.7c,d

Trichome

156 ± 11

121 ± 12.0

180 ± 15a,b

185 ± 12c,d

Stomata

71 ± 5.4

65 ± 7.1

125 ± 12a,b

128 ± 11c,d